I found the Outlander books in my late teens or early twenties amd fell in love. Seriously, I have at least three different sets of the books and that doesn’t count my Kindle copies. The only other book series I’ve ever done that with is Harry Potter.I love Claire and Jamie. I love everyone else in their world too. Colum and Dougal, Frank and “Black Jack ” Randall and everyone else. Yesterday I saw this post .
The writer refers to Frank Randall as a twit and I found that this bothers me immensely. Frank is not Jamie but he does love Claire very much, if you need proof look no further than the fact that he raised a child that he knew was not his own. He and Claire’s relationship may be strained but he throws himself into loving the little girl with his whole self. His love for Claire is definitely not the forest fire blaze that Jamie sometimes is but that is because Frank and Jamie are two very different people. You don’t need a bonfire to heat a house a fire contained within a fireplace is still fire.
In fact it is these two vastly dissimilar relationships that put the Outlander series into a weight class entirely its own. I’ve never seen another series in which the female protagonist has two relationships, both of which last decades, in two different centuries. I feel terrible for Frank because he has the misfortune of having a face that is an almost exact copy of “Black Jack” Randall, a truly horrifying person who finds immense pleasure in torture and rape of any person who he wishes to exert power over. Frank’s only fault as far as I can see and bearing in mind that in spite of having the entire series several times over I am still less than halfway through, is being a direct descendent of Black Jack which really isn’t his fault, nobody gets to choose their blood relatives after all.
I admit that I started reading for Jamie and Claire and Frank and romance and sex. Then met Himself and was totally and thoroughly invested in the series and it wasn’t even halfway through the first book. Colum ban Campbell MacKenzie is chief of the MacKenzie clan and also has Toulouse-Lautrec syndrome a degenerative disease that is similar to osteogenesis imperfecta which also causes sterility, a fact important to the plot of the first book. Anybody who knows me for a considerable length of time can tell you that one of my biggest soap boxes is the invisibility of the disabled body in media. If a disabled person is shown in is often in the role of saint, martyr, or else curiosity.Colum Mackenzie is definitely not any of these. Warped limbs or not no one would ever mistake him for a shrinking violet and crossing him isn’t wise.
He refuses to appear ashamed of his disability even though he holds the very common belief that his disability is punishment from the Devil. When a tailor takes it upon himself to make him a coat that would hide his twisted legs Colum holds the man at knife point and demands a standard mens frock coat which falls just above the knee be ready the next day , I cheered aloud.
I love to hate Black Jack. He is so complicated and nuanced. He is evil, absolutely no argument there,but there are no physical tells no warts, disfigurements etc. in fact he is very handsome, his speech polished, his manners charming as the situation requires. The only physical difference between him and Claire’s Frank is that his hair is long enough to tie back where Frank’s is short. If Claire had not met Black Jack whilr in Jamie’s era I don’t believe her and Frank’s relatiomship would have suffered as deeply when she came back. Think about it by the time she returns she and Jamie has both been assulted mutiple times by a sadist who wears the exact face of the man she has just returned to, that would be enough to give anyone nightmares. ‘
Outlander is Claire and Jamie’s story all day long but dismissing supporting characters is a huge mistake.It narrows the focus of a complex story that is about so much more than just the two leads and reduces it to the level of a drugstore paperback romance.
Author’s Note: None of thee images are mine.